<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1045 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388796</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment on notional interest on compulsorily convertible debentures was held unsustainable where the non-resident Mauritius assessee had waived interest and no actual receipt was shown. Article 11(1) of the India-Mauritius DTAA was read as taxing only interest arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other State, requiring actual payment or receipt rather than hypothetical accrual. Because section 90(1) gives overriding effect to the more beneficial treaty provision, income not chargeable under the treaty could not be brought to tax under the Act, and the transfer pricing machinery under section 92(1) could not be applied to a notional receivable. The addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1045 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388796</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment on notional interest on compulsorily convertible debentures was held unsustainable where the non-resident Mauritius assessee had waived interest and no actual receipt was shown. Article 11(1) of the India-Mauritius DTAA was read as taxing only interest arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other State, requiring actual payment or receipt rather than hypothetical accrual. Because section 90(1) gives overriding effect to the more beneficial treaty provision, income not chargeable under the treaty could not be brought to tax under the Act, and the transfer pricing machinery under section 92(1) could not be applied to a notional receivable. The addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>