<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1040 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388791</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to non-service of the adjudication order on the appellant. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the address provided and held that the order was not properly served. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication to allow the appellant a fair opportunity to present their case. The decision emphasized the significance of ensuring proper service of adjudication orders and providing parties with a chance to be heard before authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 09:54:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1040 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388791</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to non-service of the adjudication order on the appellant. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the address provided and held that the order was not properly served. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication to allow the appellant a fair opportunity to present their case. The decision emphasized the significance of ensuring proper service of adjudication orders and providing parties with a chance to be heard before authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>