<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1038 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original authority for a fresh decision in compliance with the law regarding the applicability of sections 28AB and 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 on duty liability transferred under tradeable scrip. The decision aimed to ensure proper determination of liability under the Customs Act, emphasizing the need for a thorough assessment of duty liability transfer and adherence to legal procedures in settlement applications and adjudication proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 09:54:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1038 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original authority for a fresh decision in compliance with the law regarding the applicability of sections 28AB and 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 on duty liability transferred under tradeable scrip. The decision aimed to ensure proper determination of liability under the Customs Act, emphasizing the need for a thorough assessment of duty liability transfer and adherence to legal procedures in settlement applications and adjudication proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>