<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20513</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the first two issues, ruling against the assessee. On the third issue, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that initial depreciation should not be deducted in determining the written down values of depreciable assets for the computation of capital employed under section 80J.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:40:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20513</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the first two issues, ruling against the assessee. On the third issue, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that initial depreciation should not be deducted in determining the written down values of depreciable assets for the computation of capital employed under section 80J.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>