https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284527 The Supreme Court affirmed the plaintiff's right to withdraw the suit under Order XXIII Rule 1 without seeking permission to file a fresh suit. The Trial Court and Revision Court were justified in allowing the withdrawal. The High Court erred in setting aside the lower courts' orders and directing the plaintiff to give possession of the land to the defendant, as it exceeded its jurisdiction by delving into issues beyond the withdrawal of the suit. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, reinstated the lower courts' orders, and advised the defendant to address ownership and possession issues in separate proceedings. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Nov 2019 09:53:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284527 The Supreme Court affirmed the plaintiff's right to withdraw the suit under Order XXIII Rule 1 without seeking permission to file a fresh suit. The Trial Court and Revision Court were justified in allowing the withdrawal. The High Court erred in setting aside the lower courts' orders and directing the plaintiff to give possession of the land to the defendant, as it exceeded its jurisdiction by delving into issues beyond the withdrawal of the suit. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, reinstated the lower courts' orders, and advised the defendant to address ownership and possession issues in separate proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284527