<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 16 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20511</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to redeposit specific amounts with interest in the petitioner&#039;s accounts within one month. The court criticized the Revenue&#039;s conduct, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions and imposing costs on the Revenue for withholding the petitioner&#039;s refund unlawfully.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:34:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 16 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20511</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to redeposit specific amounts with interest in the petitioner&#039;s accounts within one month. The court criticized the Revenue&#039;s conduct, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions and imposing costs on the Revenue for withholding the petitioner&#039;s refund unlawfully.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>