<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1944 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals against orders deleting disallowance under section 14A of Rs. 3,03,53,000 for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. As the assessee did not earn exempt income, section 14A could not apply. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, aligning with ITAT Hyderabad Bench&#039;s view and citing precedents. The appeals were therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:56:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1944 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals against orders deleting disallowance under section 14A of Rs. 3,03,53,000 for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. As the assessee did not earn exempt income, section 14A could not apply. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, aligning with ITAT Hyderabad Bench&#039;s view and citing precedents. The appeals were therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>