<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1769 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in favor of the Assessee, ruling that since no exempt income was earned from investments, disallowance under section 14A was not applicable. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing the Assessee&#039;s previous case precedent and rejecting the Assessee&#039;s request for adjournment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:56:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1769 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in favor of the Assessee, ruling that since no exempt income was earned from investments, disallowance under section 14A was not applicable. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing the Assessee&#039;s previous case precedent and rejecting the Assessee&#039;s request for adjournment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>