<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1023 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the exclusion of certain comparables and the treatment of service tax refunds for deduction under Section 10A. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer and Assessing Officer for further verification and fresh consideration on specific issues, based on functional dissimilarity and adherence to judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1023 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the exclusion of certain comparables and the treatment of service tax refunds for deduction under Section 10A. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer and Assessing Officer for further verification and fresh consideration on specific issues, based on functional dissimilarity and adherence to judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>