<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1021 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388772</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s claim for lease charges as revenue expenditure but allowed the alternate claim for depreciation and interest on the full value of the asset. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the need for the AO to follow statutory requirements when invoking specific provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:39:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1021 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388772</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s claim for lease charges as revenue expenditure but allowed the alternate claim for depreciation and interest on the full value of the asset. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the need for the AO to follow statutory requirements when invoking specific provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>