<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1012 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388763</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for recovery of refunds but set aside penalties and interest. The appeal was partly allowed, and the penalty on the Director was also set aside. The certificates&#039; cancellation was deemed invalid, penalties under Section 11AC and interest under Section 11AB were not sustainable due to the time-barred demand. The Tribunal found no misrepresentation in obtaining eligibility certificates and held the department&#039;s allegations unfounded. The eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 39/2001-CE was disputed, with the appellant claiming new unit status, while the department argued otherwise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1012 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388763</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for recovery of refunds but set aside penalties and interest. The appeal was partly allowed, and the penalty on the Director was also set aside. The certificates&#039; cancellation was deemed invalid, penalties under Section 11AC and interest under Section 11AB were not sustainable due to the time-barred demand. The Tribunal found no misrepresentation in obtaining eligibility certificates and held the department&#039;s allegations unfounded. The eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 39/2001-CE was disputed, with the appellant claiming new unit status, while the department argued otherwise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>