<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 67 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20503</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee on various issues including the validity of the show-cause notice, nature of the orders, inclusion of capital gains, merger of orders, and revisability of directions. The Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 and the Tribunal&#039;s decision were upheld as legally valid, directing a fresh assessment due to errors in income exclusion. The judgment favored the Revenue on most questions, with costs unspecified and a copy transmitted to the Appellate Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 67 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20503</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee on various issues including the validity of the show-cause notice, nature of the orders, inclusion of capital gains, merger of orders, and revisability of directions. The Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 and the Tribunal&#039;s decision were upheld as legally valid, directing a fresh assessment due to errors in income exclusion. The judgment favored the Revenue on most questions, with costs unspecified and a copy transmitted to the Appellate Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>