https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284497 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the Assessment Order for the Assessment Year 2013-2014. It held that the Assessing Officer did not have the jurisdiction to impose a penalty through a separate order under section 16[2], as section 16[2] retained its relevance despite the introduction of a new section. The Assessment Order dated 10.09.2015 was overturned, and no costs were awarded in the case. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:53:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284497 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the Assessment Order for the Assessment Year 2013-2014. It held that the Assessing Officer did not have the jurisdiction to impose a penalty through a separate order under section 16[2], as section 16[2] retained its relevance despite the introduction of a new section. The Assessment Order dated 10.09.2015 was overturned, and no costs were awarded in the case. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284497