<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1768 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance made by the AO and permitting the interest expenditure under section 57(iii). The judgment emphasized the relevance of commercial expediency and the direct nexus between expenditure and income, aligning with established legal precedents. The decision impacts the total income determination and potentially the penalty proceedings initiated under section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:53:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1768 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance made by the AO and permitting the interest expenditure under section 57(iii). The judgment emphasized the relevance of commercial expediency and the direct nexus between expenditure and income, aligning with established legal precedents. The decision impacts the total income determination and potentially the penalty proceedings initiated under section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>