<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1704 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284495</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the Assessee, allowing the appeal against the disallowance of ESI and EPF payments. The Tribunal determined that the payments made before the due date for filing the income tax return should be allowed as deductions, not treated as income. The decision emphasized compliance with the IT Act deadlines and referenced supporting case law, including the Karnataka HC and SC decisions, thereby deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1704 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284495</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the Assessee, allowing the appeal against the disallowance of ESI and EPF payments. The Tribunal determined that the payments made before the due date for filing the income tax return should be allowed as deductions, not treated as income. The decision emphasized compliance with the IT Act deadlines and referenced supporting case law, including the Karnataka HC and SC decisions, thereby deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>