<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1351 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284494</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, permitting software expenses to be treated as revenue expenditure and recognizing business losses on the sale of Canexpo and Bank of India units as business losses. The ITAT emphasized commercial expediency and the nature of investments in determining the treatment of losses, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1351 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284494</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, permitting software expenses to be treated as revenue expenditure and recognizing business losses on the sale of Canexpo and Bank of India units as business losses. The ITAT emphasized commercial expediency and the nature of investments in determining the treatment of losses, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>