https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388742 The High Court issued a notice in response to the petitioner's challenge against the confiscation of goods and a vehicle under section 130 of the CGST Act. Despite no discrepancies found during physical verification, the respondents proceeded with the confiscation based on alleged involvement in bogus billing practices or false ITC claims. The court will assess the legality and justification of the confiscation order in light of the absence of irregularities during inspection. The outcome will clarify the application of CGST Act provisions regarding confiscation in cases where no discrepancies are identified during verification. en-us Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388742 The High Court issued a notice in response to the petitioner's challenge against the confiscation of goods and a vehicle under section 130 of the CGST Act. Despite no discrepancies found during physical verification, the respondents proceeded with the confiscation based on alleged involvement in bogus billing practices or false ITC claims. The court will assess the legality and justification of the confiscation order in light of the absence of irregularities during inspection. The outcome will clarify the application of CGST Act provisions regarding confiscation in cases where no discrepancies are identified during verification. Case-Laws GST Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388742