<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 972 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388723</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the Commissioner of Customs due to lack of proper adjudication and insufficient reasons provided for reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant for gold smuggling. The Court emphasized the importance of clear reasoning and adherence to the law in such decisions, setting aside the parts of the orders related to the appellant&#039;s alleged involvement and disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:46:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 972 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388723</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the Commissioner of Customs due to lack of proper adjudication and insufficient reasons provided for reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant for gold smuggling. The Court emphasized the importance of clear reasoning and adherence to the law in such decisions, setting aside the parts of the orders related to the appellant&#039;s alleged involvement and disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>