<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 971 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388722</link>
    <description>The court granted bail to the applicants, directors of courier agencies, in a case involving the alleged smuggling of foreign marked gold bars. The court found further detention unnecessary, considering the applicants&#039; limited role in courier services and lack of evidence proving their knowledge of the parcel contents. Bail was allowed under specific conditions, including cash bail, reporting to authorities, cooperating with trial proceedings, and refraining from tampering with evidence or leaving the country without permission. The court emphasized that its decision was preliminary, with the trial court set to determine the case&#039;s outcome based on merits and the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 971 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388722</link>
      <description>The court granted bail to the applicants, directors of courier agencies, in a case involving the alleged smuggling of foreign marked gold bars. The court found further detention unnecessary, considering the applicants&#039; limited role in courier services and lack of evidence proving their knowledge of the parcel contents. Bail was allowed under specific conditions, including cash bail, reporting to authorities, cooperating with trial proceedings, and refraining from tampering with evidence or leaving the country without permission. The court emphasized that its decision was preliminary, with the trial court set to determine the case&#039;s outcome based on merits and the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>