<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 965 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388716</link>
    <description>The court held that the Company Law Board (CLB) exceeded its authority by using inherent powers to review its orders, as the power of review was not explicitly granted by the regulations. The respondents&#039; delay in filing the rejoinder was deemed unjustified, with no evidence supporting allegations of misleading statements or fabricated documents. As a result, the appeal was successful, and the CLB&#039;s order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 965 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388716</link>
      <description>The court held that the Company Law Board (CLB) exceeded its authority by using inherent powers to review its orders, as the power of review was not explicitly granted by the regulations. The respondents&#039; delay in filing the rejoinder was deemed unjustified, with no evidence supporting allegations of misleading statements or fabricated documents. As a result, the appeal was successful, and the CLB&#039;s order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>