https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388713 The court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the Enforcement Directorate's actions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It upheld the legality of the letter sent to banks, the validity of the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO), and the Complaint filed under the Act. The court affirmed the jurisdiction and procedural compliance of the Enforcement Directorate, allowing the retrospective application of the PMLA to offenses committed before relevant sections were included in its schedule. The petitioner's contentions were dismissed, emphasizing the need to exhaust remedies before the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Tribunal. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:46:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388713 The court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the Enforcement Directorate's actions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It upheld the legality of the letter sent to banks, the validity of the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO), and the Complaint filed under the Act. The court affirmed the jurisdiction and procedural compliance of the Enforcement Directorate, allowing the retrospective application of the PMLA to offenses committed before relevant sections were included in its schedule. The petitioner's contentions were dismissed, emphasizing the need to exhaust remedies before the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Tribunal. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388713