https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388710 The court directed the respondents to suspend coercive recovery actions for eight weeks due to lack of acknowledgment of service of the appellate order on the petitioner. The Writ Petition seeking to quash the Commissioner (Appeals) order was not granted. Instead, the petitioner was allowed to file an appeal challenging the order within four weeks. The court emphasized the importance of proper service of orders and adherence to appellate procedures. The case was disposed of with no costs, emphasizing the need for timely and proper legal procedures in administrative challenges. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Dec 2019 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388710 The court directed the respondents to suspend coercive recovery actions for eight weeks due to lack of acknowledgment of service of the appellate order on the petitioner. The Writ Petition seeking to quash the Commissioner (Appeals) order was not granted. Instead, the petitioner was allowed to file an appeal challenging the order within four weeks. The court emphasized the importance of proper service of orders and adherence to appellate procedures. The case was disposed of with no costs, emphasizing the need for timely and proper legal procedures in administrative challenges. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388710