<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 954 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, upholding the classification of goods under Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute centered on whether the items manufactured by M/s Techno Forge Ltd. fell under chapter heading 7326 or chapter 84. The Tribunal found that the drilling process conducted by the appellant did not alter the essential character of the goods, leading to the decision that the classification should remain under Chapter 73.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 954 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, upholding the classification of goods under Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute centered on whether the items manufactured by M/s Techno Forge Ltd. fell under chapter heading 7326 or chapter 84. The Tribunal found that the drilling process conducted by the appellant did not alter the essential character of the goods, leading to the decision that the classification should remain under Chapter 73.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>