<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Trading Exempt u/r 6(3); Reversal u/r 3(5) Exempts Appellant from Rule 6(3) Obligations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50319</link>
    <description>It is true that ‘trading’ is an exempted service and Rule 6(3) covers exempted services. However, having reversed an amount under Rule 3(5) of CCR 2004, the appellant will not be covered by Rule 6(3) because the credit attributable to the inputs removed as such, has already been reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:14:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:14:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Trading Exempt u/r 6(3); Reversal u/r 3(5) Exempts Appellant from Rule 6(3) Obligations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50319</link>
      <description>It is true that ‘trading’ is an exempted service and Rule 6(3) covers exempted services. However, having reversed an amount under Rule 3(5) of CCR 2004, the appellant will not be covered by Rule 6(3) because the credit attributable to the inputs removed as such, has already been reversed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:14:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>