<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 952 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388703</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for verification of the amounts reversed by the appellant. If verified, the demands, interest, and penalties would be set aside. The judgment highlighted the appellant&#039;s compliance with Rule 3(5) for inputs cleared as such and the effective maintenance of separate accounts under Rule 6(2) through proportionate reversal of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 952 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388703</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for verification of the amounts reversed by the appellant. If verified, the demands, interest, and penalties would be set aside. The judgment highlighted the appellant&#039;s compliance with Rule 3(5) for inputs cleared as such and the effective maintenance of separate accounts under Rule 6(2) through proportionate reversal of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>