https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284488 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the decision of the Chief Judge of the Small Causes Court, Bombay. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of consultation with the Corporation before recognizing any subsidised housing scheme under Sub-section (3) of Section 154 for rateable value determination. No order as to costs was made. en-us Fri, 07 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284488 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the decision of the Chief Judge of the Small Causes Court, Bombay. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of consultation with the Corporation before recognizing any subsidised housing scheme under Sub-section (3) of Section 154 for rateable value determination. No order as to costs was made. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284488