<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20484</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Income-tax Officer correctly rectified a mistake in granting relief under section 91 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the devaluation profit had not been taxed in Malaysia, leading to double taxation in India only on a reduced sum. The Court emphasized the importance of accurately applying double taxation relief provisions and rectifying errors to avoid double taxation and ensure fair income treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20484</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Income-tax Officer correctly rectified a mistake in granting relief under section 91 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the devaluation profit had not been taxed in Malaysia, leading to double taxation in India only on a reduced sum. The Court emphasized the importance of accurately applying double taxation relief provisions and rectifying errors to avoid double taxation and ensure fair income treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>