https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284474 The Tribunal allowed the Cross Objection filed by the assessee and partly allowed the appeal filed by the revenue for statistical purposes. This decision was based on a detailed analysis of the issues raised in the appeals, including the exclusion of certain comparables by the DRP, working capital adjustment without a cap, and the corporate tax issue regarding approval granted by CBDT for the gratuity fund trust. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's objections on certain comparables and declined to interfere with the DRP's decision on the working capital adjustment, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties. en-us Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Dec 2022 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284474 The Tribunal allowed the Cross Objection filed by the assessee and partly allowed the appeal filed by the revenue for statistical purposes. This decision was based on a detailed analysis of the issues raised in the appeals, including the exclusion of certain comparables by the DRP, working capital adjustment without a cap, and the corporate tax issue regarding approval granted by CBDT for the gratuity fund trust. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's objections on certain comparables and declined to interfere with the DRP's decision on the working capital adjustment, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284474