https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284477 The court dismissed the appeal by DDA, affirming that the Society did not breach the lease-deed terms by changing its membership. The cancellation of the land allotment was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the distinct legal identity of the Society from its members. The court found no evidence supporting DDA's claims under the principle of tracing, as there was no proof that funds contributed by new members reached Mr. Naresh Chandra or his family. en-us Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:51:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284477 The court dismissed the appeal by DDA, affirming that the Society did not breach the lease-deed terms by changing its membership. The cancellation of the land allotment was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the distinct legal identity of the Society from its members. The court found no evidence supporting DDA's claims under the principle of tracing, as there was no proof that funds contributed by new members reached Mr. Naresh Chandra or his family. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284477