<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 100 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20482</link>
    <description>On a partial partition of Hindu undivided family property, a coparcener&#039;s receipt of a lesser share than his notional entitlement can amount to a disposition attracting the estate duty deeming provisions. The Karnataka HC noted that the partition deed treated the properties as fully partitioned and negatived further claims, so the deceased had relinquished the shortfall in his right. That relinquishment was treated as property passing by disposition under the statutory scheme, and the absence of an express clause for later adjustment did not prevent application of the deeming provision. The Tribunal&#039;s view was rejected, and the shortfall was liable to be treated as a deemed disposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:11:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 100 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20482</link>
      <description>On a partial partition of Hindu undivided family property, a coparcener&#039;s receipt of a lesser share than his notional entitlement can amount to a disposition attracting the estate duty deeming provisions. The Karnataka HC noted that the partition deed treated the properties as fully partitioned and negatived further claims, so the deceased had relinquished the shortfall in his right. That relinquishment was treated as property passing by disposition under the statutory scheme, and the absence of an express clause for later adjustment did not prevent application of the deeming provision. The Tribunal&#039;s view was rejected, and the shortfall was liable to be treated as a deemed disposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>