https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388692 The High Court of Calcutta addressed the jurisdiction over revising contents in Form GST TRAN-2, citing conflicting views from Calcutta and Karnataka High Courts. The court emphasized the importance of serving the petition on the respondent's advocate, directing the petitioner to comply with procedural rules or provide justification for not doing so. The case was scheduled for further proceedings on 8th November 2019, highlighting the significance of procedural adherence and differing legal interpretations among High Courts on GST form matters. en-us Fri, 01 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388692 The High Court of Calcutta addressed the jurisdiction over revising contents in Form GST TRAN-2, citing conflicting views from Calcutta and Karnataka High Courts. The court emphasized the importance of serving the petition on the respondent's advocate, directing the petitioner to comply with procedural rules or provide justification for not doing so. The case was scheduled for further proceedings on 8th November 2019, highlighting the significance of procedural adherence and differing legal interpretations among High Courts on GST form matters. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388692