<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 84 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20476</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the company, stating that the loss arising from the devaluation of the Indian rupee in the repayment of a foreign currency loan for capital goods is not deductible as a revenue expenditure for tax purposes. The court emphasized the distinction between revenue and capital expenditures in such cases, ultimately deciding in favor of the Revenue and denying the company&#039;s claim for deduction of the increased liability due to devaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:54:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 84 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20476</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the company, stating that the loss arising from the devaluation of the Indian rupee in the repayment of a foreign currency loan for capital goods is not deductible as a revenue expenditure for tax purposes. The court emphasized the distinction between revenue and capital expenditures in such cases, ultimately deciding in favor of the Revenue and denying the company&#039;s claim for deduction of the increased liability due to devaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>