<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 912 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388663</link>
    <description>Rejection of books and separate additions for unaccounted sales and GP estimation were held unsustainable because the computation adopted inconsistent assumptions on cost and &quot;seed capital&quot; vis-à-vis the estimated profit rate, and the assessee had already voluntarily offered higher income on the same material, making further additions duplicative; the additions for unaccounted sales/related factors were deleted. Addition for low GP was rejected as the AO ignored multiple detailed submissions explaining the marginal 1.04% fall and gave no legally sustainable basis to disturb the disclosed GP; the GP addition was deleted. Additions for gold and silver &quot;jangad&quot; stock were disallowed since purchases and payments were evidenced in registers/invoices and confirmed in cross-enquiries, and the AO failed to verify or logically conclude enquiries; the jangad stock additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 912 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388663</link>
      <description>Rejection of books and separate additions for unaccounted sales and GP estimation were held unsustainable because the computation adopted inconsistent assumptions on cost and &quot;seed capital&quot; vis-à-vis the estimated profit rate, and the assessee had already voluntarily offered higher income on the same material, making further additions duplicative; the additions for unaccounted sales/related factors were deleted. Addition for low GP was rejected as the AO ignored multiple detailed submissions explaining the marginal 1.04% fall and gave no legally sustainable basis to disturb the disclosed GP; the GP addition was deleted. Additions for gold and silver &quot;jangad&quot; stock were disallowed since purchases and payments were evidenced in registers/invoices and confirmed in cross-enquiries, and the AO failed to verify or logically conclude enquiries; the jangad stock additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>