<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 905 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388656</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the absence of a proposal for reclassification and flawed reliance on tariff value without proper classification. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and statutory provisions in customs assessments, highlighting the need for compliance with the Customs Act provisions on determining tariff value and reclassifying goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 905 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388656</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the absence of a proposal for reclassification and flawed reliance on tariff value without proper classification. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and statutory provisions in customs assessments, highlighting the need for compliance with the Customs Act provisions on determining tariff value and reclassifying goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>