<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1783 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284464</link>
    <description>Section 10(37) applies where the land falls within the specified urban area, was used for agricultural purposes during the two years before transfer, and is transferred by compulsory acquisition or for consideration fixed or approved under the acquisition process. On the facts discussed, the land was treated as agricultural based on the agricultural officer&#039;s certificate, the nature of improvements, the acquisition records, and surrounding circumstances. Execution of a sale deed after negotiation on compensation did not change the character of the transfer, because the acquisition proceedings had already been initiated and the settlement related only to compensation. The capital gains exemption was therefore available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:08:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1783 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284464</link>
      <description>Section 10(37) applies where the land falls within the specified urban area, was used for agricultural purposes during the two years before transfer, and is transferred by compulsory acquisition or for consideration fixed or approved under the acquisition process. On the facts discussed, the land was treated as agricultural based on the agricultural officer&#039;s certificate, the nature of improvements, the acquisition records, and surrounding circumstances. Execution of a sale deed after negotiation on compensation did not change the character of the transfer, because the acquisition proceedings had already been initiated and the settlement related only to compensation. The capital gains exemption was therefore available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>