https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284457 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld CIT(A) regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, ruling that tax deduction was not necessary for reimbursements as the payments made by the assessee to CKIL were already subjected to TDS by CKIL. Both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross objection were dismissed, affirming the Ld CIT(A)'s decision. en-us Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:03:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284457 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld CIT(A) regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, ruling that tax deduction was not necessary for reimbursements as the payments made by the assessee to CKIL were already subjected to TDS by CKIL. Both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross objection were dismissed, affirming the Ld CIT(A)'s decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284457