https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388638 The court upheld the detention order (Ext.P4) due to the absence of the original invoice during the transportation of goods, citing Section 129 of the GST Act. However, the petitioner was granted the opportunity to secure the release of the consignment and vehicle by providing a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty amount determined in the order. The court emphasized the importance of complying with documentary requirements for transporting goods under the GST Act and directed the respondent to proceed with adjudication after hearing the petitioner. en-us Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388638 The court upheld the detention order (Ext.P4) due to the absence of the original invoice during the transportation of goods, citing Section 129 of the GST Act. However, the petitioner was granted the opportunity to secure the release of the consignment and vehicle by providing a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty amount determined in the order. The court emphasized the importance of complying with documentary requirements for transporting goods under the GST Act and directed the respondent to proceed with adjudication after hearing the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388638