<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 880 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388631</link>
    <description>The High Court provisionally entertained the writ petition due to the non-constitution of the Tribunal. An interim relief was granted, halting the confiscation of the truck pending the petitioner&#039;s deposit of an amount equivalent to the tax on the goods loaded. The court required the Standing Counsel to file a counter affidavit within two weeks for the upcoming hearing, ensuring a fair opportunity for both parties to present their arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 880 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388631</link>
      <description>The High Court provisionally entertained the writ petition due to the non-constitution of the Tribunal. An interim relief was granted, halting the confiscation of the truck pending the petitioner&#039;s deposit of an amount equivalent to the tax on the goods loaded. The court required the Standing Counsel to file a counter affidavit within two weeks for the upcoming hearing, ensuring a fair opportunity for both parties to present their arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>