https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388629 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a public limited Company, in a case concerning the assessment procedure under the Income Tax Act and the implementation of e-proceedings. The court found that the objections filed by the petitioner were within the timeline as they were based on the receipt of the manual draft assessment order, not the electronic one. As a result, the court set aside the panel's order and deemed the assessment order illegal for not awaiting the panel's decision. The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the panel and assessment orders, and directed a reconsideration of objections and a completion of assessment proceedings within specified timeframes. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388629 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a public limited Company, in a case concerning the assessment procedure under the Income Tax Act and the implementation of e-proceedings. The court found that the objections filed by the petitioner were within the timeline as they were based on the receipt of the manual draft assessment order, not the electronic one. As a result, the court set aside the panel's order and deemed the assessment order illegal for not awaiting the panel's decision. The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the panel and assessment orders, and directed a reconsideration of objections and a completion of assessment proceedings within specified timeframes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388629