<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 876 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388627</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s finding on the validity of the second proviso to Rule 5(1A) but did not grant relief to the Revenue based on the Supreme Court precedent. Both appeals filed by the Revenue were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 876 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388627</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s finding on the validity of the second proviso to Rule 5(1A) but did not grant relief to the Revenue based on the Supreme Court precedent. Both appeals filed by the Revenue were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>