<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 870 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, instructing the AO to limit additions by aligning the G.P. rate on disputed purchases with genuine purchases. The assessee must submit relevant evidence, and the AO must offer a fair hearing before finalizing the order. The decision underscores adherence to legal principles and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 870 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, instructing the AO to limit additions by aligning the G.P. rate on disputed purchases with genuine purchases. The assessee must submit relevant evidence, and the AO must offer a fair hearing before finalizing the order. The decision underscores adherence to legal principles and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>