<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 868 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388619</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 1,22,29,000/- made by the AO under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. ITAT held that cash deposits in bank accounts, not recorded in the books of accounts, cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit under Section 68, referencing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 868 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388619</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 1,22,29,000/- made by the AO under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. ITAT held that cash deposits in bank accounts, not recorded in the books of accounts, cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit under Section 68, referencing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>