<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 861 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 read with Section 148 was invalid as the Assessing Officer did not independently apply his mind and the reasons recorded were vague and based on borrowed satisfaction from the Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation). The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the reopening of the assessment was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 861 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 read with Section 148 was invalid as the Assessing Officer did not independently apply his mind and the reasons recorded were vague and based on borrowed satisfaction from the Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation). The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the reopening of the assessment was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>