<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 847 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388598</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s claim for fee continuity benefit was dismissed, but SEBI was directed to recalculate the turnover fee at the rate applicable to the WDM segment. Interest on delayed payments was upheld, and the Tribunal provided a structured timeline for recalculating and settling the fee liability. No orders on costs were issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:20:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 847 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388598</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s claim for fee continuity benefit was dismissed, but SEBI was directed to recalculate the turnover fee at the rate applicable to the WDM segment. Interest on delayed payments was upheld, and the Tribunal provided a structured timeline for recalculating and settling the fee liability. No orders on costs were issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>