<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 95 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20462</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled that relief under section 80J(1) and development rebate should not be set off against capital gains but against the respective business income. The court clarified that deductions should be applied as per specific provisions for each income head before arriving at the total income. The court rejected arguments that relief under section 80J(1) should be allowed against capital gains and that development rebate should be set off against capital gains instead of business income. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 95 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20462</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled that relief under section 80J(1) and development rebate should not be set off against capital gains but against the respective business income. The court clarified that deductions should be applied as per specific provisions for each income head before arriving at the total income. The court rejected arguments that relief under section 80J(1) should be allowed against capital gains and that development rebate should be set off against capital gains instead of business income. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>