<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 839 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388590</link>
    <description>Where the Revenue stated it would not take further coercive steps after learning that the assessee had filed an appeal and a further appeal was pending, the writ court found no surviving live controversy. It held that the same relief could be pursued before the appellate tribunal and therefore disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without granting substantive relief in the writ forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 839 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388590</link>
      <description>Where the Revenue stated it would not take further coercive steps after learning that the assessee had filed an appeal and a further appeal was pending, the writ court found no surviving live controversy. It held that the same relief could be pursued before the appellate tribunal and therefore disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without granting substantive relief in the writ forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>