https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388586 The Tribunal confirmed the rejection of the declaration filed under the VCES Scheme, evasion of service tax, disallowance of Cenvat Credit, demand on a reverse charge basis, and penalties imposed. The penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act was reduced due to prior deposits. The denial of Cenvat Credit was set aside, confirming service tax liability for legal services. The penalty under Section 77 of the Act was also set aside, considering the penalty under Section 78, leading to the disposal of the appeal with specified penalty reductions and confirmations. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:27:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388586 The Tribunal confirmed the rejection of the declaration filed under the VCES Scheme, evasion of service tax, disallowance of Cenvat Credit, demand on a reverse charge basis, and penalties imposed. The penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act was reduced due to prior deposits. The denial of Cenvat Credit was set aside, confirming service tax liability for legal services. The penalty under Section 77 of the Act was also set aside, considering the penalty under Section 78, leading to the disposal of the appeal with specified penalty reductions and confirmations. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388586