https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388583 The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law. The judgment addressed a delay in filing the appeal, excise duty adjustment dispute, interpretation of statutory provisions, and unjust enrichment principle. The appellant's adjustment of duties was upheld as compliant with previous decisions, with no evidence of passing on duty incidence. The Division Bench emphasized adherence to prescribed rules. The Court's decision was based on the Tribunal's allowance of the appeal in a similar case. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Dec 2020 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388583 The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law. The judgment addressed a delay in filing the appeal, excise duty adjustment dispute, interpretation of statutory provisions, and unjust enrichment principle. The appellant's adjustment of duties was upheld as compliant with previous decisions, with no evidence of passing on duty incidence. The Division Bench emphasized adherence to prescribed rules. The Court's decision was based on the Tribunal's allowance of the appeal in a similar case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388583