<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 831 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388582</link>
    <description>Where goods were cleared on ex-factory terms and transportation and transit insurance were separately recovered, post-removal freight and insurance were held not includible in the assessable value for excise duty. The Tribunal applied the settled valuation principle that the place of removal remains the factory gate or other contractually relevant point, and that expenses incurred after removal do not form part of transaction value when the sale and transit arrangements are distinct. Delivery to the carrier could amount to delivery to the buyer, so the separate recovery of transit charges did not alter their excludibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:58:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 831 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388582</link>
      <description>Where goods were cleared on ex-factory terms and transportation and transit insurance were separately recovered, post-removal freight and insurance were held not includible in the assessable value for excise duty. The Tribunal applied the settled valuation principle that the place of removal remains the factory gate or other contractually relevant point, and that expenses incurred after removal do not form part of transaction value when the sale and transit arrangements are distinct. Delivery to the carrier could amount to delivery to the buyer, so the separate recovery of transit charges did not alter their excludibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>