<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 827 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388578</link>
    <description>The High Court refrained from deciding on the lease renewal issue, deferring to the Civil Court where the matter is pending. The petitioner was instructed to involve the Commercial Tax Department in the ongoing suit for relief. The status quo on the petitioner&#039;s registration was preserved until the Civil Court&#039;s determination. The Commercial Tax Department was allowed to pursue tax recovery actions against the property owners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 827 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388578</link>
      <description>The High Court refrained from deciding on the lease renewal issue, deferring to the Civil Court where the matter is pending. The petitioner was instructed to involve the Commercial Tax Department in the ongoing suit for relief. The status quo on the petitioner&#039;s registration was preserved until the Civil Court&#039;s determination. The Commercial Tax Department was allowed to pursue tax recovery actions against the property owners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>